4.7 Article

Sociability strongly affects the behavioural responses of wild guanacos to drones

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00234-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ANCyT-FONCYT [PICT 2015 1780]
  2. CONICET (Argentina) [PIP 2015 0425]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of sociability on wildlife's behavioral responses to drone disturbance is significant, with large groups showing higher reaction probability and greater flight distances compared to smaller groups and solitary individuals. Low flight heights increase the probability of reaction.
Drones are being increasingly used in research and recreation but without an adequate assessment of their potential impacts on wildlife. Particularly, the effect of sociability on behavioural responses to drone-associated disturbance remains largely unknown. Using an ungulate with complex social behaviour, we (1) assessed how social aggregation and offspring presence, along with flight plan characteristics, influence the probability of behavioural reaction and the flight distance of wild guanacos (Lama guanicoe) to the drone's approach, and (2) estimated reaction thresholds and flight heights that minimise disturbance. Sociability significantly affected behavioural responses. Large groups showed higher reaction probability and greater flight distances than smaller groups and solitary individuals, regardless of the presence of offspring. This suggests greater detection abilities in large groups, but we cannot rule out the influence of other features inherent to each social unit (e.g., territoriality) that might be working simultaneously. Low flight heights increased the probability of reaction, although the effect of drone speed was less clear. Reaction thresholds ranged from 154 m (solitary individuals) to 344 m (mixed groups), revealing that the responsiveness of this guanaco population to the drone is the most dramatic reported so far for a wild species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available