4.7 Article

Incidence and clearance of anal high-risk Human Papillomavirus infection and their risk factors in men who have sex with men living with HIV

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03913-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) have a higher prevalence of anal infection by high-risk HPV and incidence of anal carcinoma. Use of cART reduces the risk of acquiring anal infection by high-risk HPV.
HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) display the highest prevalence of anal infection by high-risk Human Papillomaviruses (hrHPVs) and incidence of anal carcinoma. Anal specimens were genotyped by the Linear Array. Incidence and clearance of anal infection by hrHPVs, hrHPVs other than HPV16, low-risk HPVs, and four individual types (6,11,16,18) were estimated using a two-state Markov model. Determinants for incidence and clearance were assessed by logistic regression. Overall, 204 individuals were included (median age 42 years, IQR=34-49). For hrHPVs, incidence and clearance rates were 36.1x1000 person-months (p-m) (95% CI 23.3-56.5) and 15.6x1000 p-m (95% CI 10.7-23.3), respectively. HPV16 showed a higher incidence than HPV18 (10.2 vs. 7.2x1000 p-m). Its clearance was more than twofold lower than that of HPV18 (30.1 vs. 78.2x1000 p-m). MSM receiving cART displayed a 68% to 88% decrease in risk of acquiring hrHPVs, hrHPVs other than HPV16, HPV16, and HPV18 (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.67; aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.78; aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.90; aHR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.31, respectively) than patients not treated. A nadir CD4+count<200 cells/mm(3) significantly reduced the clearance of hrHPVs other than HPV16 (aHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.90). cART use reduces the risk of acquiring anal infection by hrHPVs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available