4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Validation of a colistin plasma concentration breakpoint as a predictor of nephrotoxicity in patients treated with colistin methanesulfonate

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 725-727

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.08.020

Keywords

Colistin; Nephrotoxicity; Risk factors; Plasma concentration; Therapeutic drug monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nephrotoxicity limits the effective use of colistin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) infections. We previously defined a steady-state colistin plasma concentration (C-ss) of 2.42 mg/L that predicted nephrotoxicity at end of treatment (EOT). The objective of this study was to validate this breakpoint in a prospective cohort. This was a multicentre, prospective, observational study conducted at three hospitals with a cohort of patients treated for MDR-GNB infection with colistin methanesulfonate from September 2011 until January 2015. Nephrotoxicity was evaluated at Day 7 and at EOT using the RIFLE criteria. C-ss values were measured and analysed using HPLC. Taking the previously defined breakpoint for colistin concentration as a criterion, patients were divided into two groups (C-ss, <= 2.42 mg/L vs. > 2.42 mg/L). Sixty-four patients were included. Seven patients (10.9%) had a C-ss > 2.42 mg/L and were compared with the remaining patients. Bivariate analysis showed that patients with a C-ss > 2.42 mg/L were older and had a significantly higher incidence of nephrotoxicity at Day 7 and EOT. Although not statistically significant, nephrotoxicity occurred earlier in these patients (6.2 days vs. 9.2 days in patients with lower C-ss; P = 0.091). Multivariate analysis of nephrotoxicity showed that C-ss > 2.42 mg/L was the only predictive factor. Nephrotoxicity was more frequent and occurred earlier in patients with colistin plasma concentrations higher than the previously defined breakpoint (2.42 mg/L). Colistin therapeutic drug monitoring should be routinely considered to avoid reaching this toxicity threshold and potential clinical consequences. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available