4.7 Article

Multi-step ahead predictive model for blood glucose concentrations of type-1 diabetic patients

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03341-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JDRF [1-SRA2019-823-S-B]
  2. National Science Foundation [1537210]
  3. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure-OAC [1910539]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1537210] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC)
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1910539] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a deep learning model, BG-Predict, for predicting blood glucose levels in diabetic patients, evaluated on data from 97 patients. Results show accurate predictions for a 30-minute horizon, aiding in reducing the risks of hypo- and hyperglycemia for patients.
Continuous monitoring of blood glucose (BG) levels is a key aspect of diabetes management. Patients with Type-1 diabetes (T1D) require an effective tool to monitor these levels in order to make appropriate decisions regarding insulin administration and food intake to keep BG levels in target range. Effectively and accurately predicting future BG levels at multi-time steps ahead benefits a patient with diabetes by helping them decrease the risks of extremes in BG including hypo- and hyperglycemia. In this study, we present a novel multi-component deep learning model BG-Predict that predicts the BG levels in a multi-step look ahead fashion. The model is evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively on actual blood glucose data for 97 patients. For the prediction horizon (PH) of 30 mins, the average values for root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and normalized mean squared error (NRMSE) are 23.22 +/- 6.39 mg/dL, 16.77 +/- 4.87 mg/dL, 12.84 +/- 3.68 and 0.08 +/- 0.01 respectively. When Clarke and Parkes error grid analyses were performed comparing predicted BG with actual BG, the results showed average percentage of points in Zone A of 80.17 +/- 9.20 and 84.81 +/- 6.11, respectively. We offer this tool as a mechanism to enhance the predictive capabilities of algorithms for patients with T1D.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available