4.7 Article

Attention-guided deep learning for gestational age prediction using fetal brain MRI

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05468-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Philips Healthcare, Cambridge, MA
  2. Stanford Precision Health and Integrated Diagnostics Individual Seed Grant Award
  3. AOA-Chi-Li Pao Foundation Stanford Student Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic resonance imaging provides unparalleled visualization of the fetal brain, but accurately determining age-appropriate neural development has been challenging. This study presents a deep learning model that predicts gestational age with high accuracy and minimal error. The model demonstrates good performance and generalizability across different institutions.
Magnetic resonance imaging offers unrivaled visualization of the fetal brain, forming the basis for establishing age-specific morphologic milestones. However, gauging age-appropriate neural development remains a difficult task due to the constantly changing appearance of the fetal brain, variable image quality, and frequent motion artifacts. Here we present an end-to-end, attention-guided deep learning model that predicts gestational age with R-2 score of 0.945, mean absolute error of 6.7 days, and concordance correlation coefficient of 0.970. The convolutional neural network was trained on a heterogeneous dataset of 741 developmentally normal fetal brain images ranging from 19 to 39 weeks in gestational age. We also demonstrate model performance and generalizability using independent datasets from four academic institutions across the U.S. and Turkey with R-2 scores of 0.81-0.90 after minimal fine-tuning. The proposed regression algorithm provides an automated machine-enabled tool with the potential to better characterize in utero neurodevelopment and guide real-time gestational age estimation after the first trimester.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available