Periodontal probing on digital images compared to clinical measurements in periodontitis patients

The aim of the study was to compare the supra-alveolar gingival dimension (GD) and the clinical pocket probing depth (PD) by combining data from an intraoral scanner (IOS) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and identify the clinical features affecting the clinical PD. 1,071 sites from 11 patients were selected for whom CBCT, IOS images, and periodontal charts were recorded at the same visit. CBCT and IOS data were superimposed. GD was measured on cross-sectional images of the probed sites. The level of agreement and correlation between GD and PD were assessed for the entire population and within groups (treated vs untreated, bleeding on probing [BOP] vs no BOP, and PDs of 0-3 mm vs 4-5 mm vs >= 6 mm). The mean [+/- SD] difference between GD and PD was 0.82 [+/- 0.69] mm, and they were positively correlated (r = 0.790, p < 0.001). The correlations between GD and PD were stronger for untreated sites, sites with BOP, and sites with a larger PD. Within the limitations of this study, the similarity between GD and PD may suggest a possible tendency of overestimation when recording PD.

Automated summary

The aim of this study was to compare the supra-alveolar gingival dimension (GD) and the clinical pocket probing depth (PD) using data from an intraoral scanner (IOS) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and identify the clinical features affecting PD. The results showed a positive correlation between GD and PD, and this correlation was stronger for untreated sites, sites with bleeding on probing (BOP), and sites with a larger PD.