4.7 Article

Seasonal variability of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D on multiple sclerosis onset

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00344-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Karolinska Institute
  2. Magreta af Ugglas foundation
  3. Horizon 2020 EU Grant (MultipleMS) [733161]
  4. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada [EGID:3045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and the age of first symptom onset in recently diagnosed MS patients. The results showed no association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and age at MS onset, but a negative correlation was observed with CSF IgG index. Further investigation is needed to explore this correlation.
Vitamin D deficiency is associated with an increased risk of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, its effect on the age of disease onset remains unclear. This study examines the relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and age of first symptom onset among recently diagnosed MS patients. Serum 25(OH)D was measured from forty MS patients sampled near disease onset. After correcting seasonal variability, the association between 25(OH)D levels, along with other clinical measures such as IgG index, and age at MS onset was examined using multivariable linear regression. Serum 25(OH)D was not correlated with age at onset (P > 0.5). We observed bias among previously reported associations between 25(OH)D and MS disease measures resulting from non-random distribution of sampling by season. After correcting for seasonal 25(OH)D and other clinical measures, only CSF IgG index remained significantly associated with age at disease onset (beta = - 5.35, P = 0.028). In summary, we observed no association between age at onset and serum 25(OH)D levels but observed a negative correlation with CSF IgG index, although this will require further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available