4.7 Article

Idiosyncratic selection of active touch for shape perception

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06807-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [786949]
  2. Sam and Frances Belzberg Chair in Memory and Learning
  3. Helen Diller Family Professorial Chair of Neurobiology
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [786949] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tracks the hand movements of participants during a shape recognition task and identifies two dominant strategies: contour following and scanning. These strategies are specific to the sensed object and are influenced by the physiological parameters of the perceiver.
Hand movements are essential for tactile perception of objects. However, the specific functions served by active touch strategies, and their dependence on physiological parameters, are unclear and understudied. Focusing on planar shape perception, we tracked at high resolution the hands of 11 participants during shape recognition task. Two dominant hand movement strategies were identified: contour following and scanning. Contour following movements were either tangential to the contour or oscillating perpendicular to it. Scanning movements crossed between distant parts of the shapes' contour. Both strategies exhibited non-uniform coverage of the shapes' contours. Idiosyncratic movement patterns were specific to the sensed object. In a second experiment, we have measured the participants' spatial and temporal tactile thresholds. Significant portions of the variations in hand speed and in oscillation patterns could be explained by the idiosyncratic thresholds. Using data-driven simulations, we show how specific strategy choices may affect receptors activation. These results suggest that motion strategies of active touch adapt to both the sensed object and to the perceiver's physiological parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available