4.7 Article

Intermittent radiotherapy as alternative treatment for recurrent high grade glioma: a modeling study based on longitudinal tumor measurements

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99507-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Moffitt Physical Sciences Oncology Center (NIH/NCI) [U54CA143970]
  2. Integrated Mathematical Oncology Department
  3. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R21CA234787]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation Spark [190647]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recurrent high grade glioma patients currently face poor prognosis without a curative treatment option. A personalized treatment strategy involving high dose intermittent radiation treatment (iRT) showed promising results compared to traditional high dose hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) in a simulation analysis, especially for patients responsive to pembrolizumab and bevacizumab. Time to progression could be prolonged through intermittently delivered fractions, making iRT a potential treatment option for recurrent high grade glioma patients.
Recurrent high grade glioma patients face a poor prognosis for which no curative treatment option currently exists. In contrast to prescribing high dose hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT, >= 6 Gy x 5 in daily fractions) with debulking intent, we suggest a personalized treatment strategy to improve tumor control by delivering high dose intermittent radiation treatment (iRT, >= 6Gy x 1 every 6 weeks). We performed a simulation analysis to compare HFSRT, iRT and iRT plus boost (>= 6 Gy x 3 in daily fractions at time of progression) based on a mathematical model of tumor growth, radiation response and patient-specific evolution of resistance to additional treatments (pembrolizumab and bevacizumab). Model parameters were fitted from tumor growth curves of 16 patients enrolled in the phase 1 NCT02313272 trial that combined HFSRT with bevacizumab and pembrolizumab. Then, iRT +/- boost treatments were simulated and compared to HFSRT based on time to tumor regrowth. The modeling results demonstrated that iRT + boost(- boost) treatment was equal or superior to HFSRT in 15(11) out of 16 cases and that patients that remained responsive to pembrolizumab and bevacizumab would benefit most from iRT. Time to progression could be prolonged through the application of additional, intermittently delivered fractions. iRT hence provides a promising treatment option for recurrent high grade glioma patients for prospective clinical evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available