4.7 Article

Application and toxicity studies of arabinoxylan and β-d-glucan stearic acid ester composite coatings in extending postharvest storage of peach

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03163-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NABI [BIRAC/TG/SAEN/01/2017]
  2. DBT [BIRAC/TG/SAEN/01/2017]
  3. BIRAC [BIRAC/TG/SAEN/01/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the use of AX-SABG coating significantly reduced the changes in weight loss, respiration rate, ripening index, and firmness of peaches during storage, and was more effective in retaining aroma volatiles and reducing disease incidence compared to uncoated peaches.
Peaches are good source of nutrients and known for their taste and aroma. The highly perishable nature of the peaches tends to decay rapidly during transportation and storage is a serious constraint for efficient transportation and storage. Therefore, the effect of arabinoxylan (AX) and beta-D-glucan stearic acid ester (SABG) composite coating material was examined for the postharvest storage quality of peach under storage at 22 +/- 2 degrees C with 85% relative humidity (RH). Both, AX-SABG and shellac (1-2%) coatings significantly reduced the change in the quality attributes like weight loss (1.2-1.4 fold), respiration rate (1.1-1.2 fold), ripening index (1.3-1.5 fold) and firmness (1.3-1.5 fold) during 6 days storage as compared to the uncoated peaches. In addition, AX-SABG (1-2%) coating was more effective in retaining aroma volatiles and reducing disease incidence compared to shellac. Further, acute and chronic toxicological studies have shown no tissue related toxicity and mortality in mice. Our results suggest that AX-SABG as an edible coating has the potential to preserve the fruit quality during 6 days storage at 22 +/- 2 degrees C and extend the postharvest shelf life of peach during storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available