4.7 Article

Changes in land use enhance the sensitivity of tropical ecosystems to fire-climate extremes

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05130-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Project Rede Pantanal (FINEP) [01.20.0201.00]
  2. CNPq [305159/2018-6]
  3. FAPER [E26/202.714/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the fires in the Pantanal wetland in 2020. The research finds that the fires were caused by a combination of multi-year drought and human activities, resulting in significant ecological and hydrological impacts on the wetland.
Pantanal, the largest contiguous wetland in the world with a high diversity of ecosystems and habitat for several endangered species, was impacted by record-breaking wildfires in 2020. In this study, we integrate satellite and modeling data that enable exploration of natural and human contributing factors to the unprecedented 2020 fires. We demonstrate that the fires were fueled by an exceptional multi-year drought, but dry conditions solely could not explain the spatial patterns of burning. Our analysis reveals how human-caused fires exacerbated drought effects on natural ecosystem within the Pantanal, with large burned fractions primarily over natural (52%), and low cattle density areas (44%) in 2020. The post-fire ecosystem and hydrology changes also had strong ecological effects, with vegetation productivity less than - 1.5 sigma over more than 30% of the natural and conservation areas. In contrast to more managed areas, there was a clear decrease in evaporation (by similar to 9%) and an increase in runoff (by similar to 5%) over the natural areas, with long-term impacts on ecosystem recovery and fire risk. This study provides the first tropical evidence outside rainforests of the synergy between climate, land management and fires, and the associated impacts on the ecosystem and hydrology over the largest contiguous wetlands in the world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available