4.6 Article

Separation of vanadium and tungsten from synthetic and spent catalyst leach solutions using an ion-exchange resin

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 3635-3645

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra05253e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korean Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korean government (MOTIE) [20217510100020]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20217510100020] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the adsorption and desorption characteristics of vanadium and tungsten ions using a simple porous anion-exchange resin. The applicability and feasible reuse of the resin were tested by recovering both metals from real spent catalysts.
Vanadium and tungsten ion adsorption and desorption characteristics and separation conditions were investigated using a simple porous anion-exchange resin. Initially, systematic experimental research was performed using synthetic aqueous vanadium and tungsten solutions. To evaluate the vanadium and tungsten (50-500 mg L-1) isotherm parameters, adsorption was performed at pH 7.0 using 0.5 g of ion-exchange resin at 303 K for 24 h. Well-known adsorption models such as Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin were used. Vanadium was desorbed from the resin using HCl and NaOH solutions. In contrast, tungsten was not desorbed by the HCl solution, which enabled the separation of the two ions. The desorption reaction reached equilibrium within 30 min of its start, yielding over 90% desorption. We investigated the adsorption mechanism and resin stability with the aid of spectroscopic and microscopic analysis, as well as adsorption results. The applicability and feasibility of the resin was tested via recovery of both metals from real spent catalysts. The applicability and reusability results indicated that the resin can be used for more than five cycles with an efficacy of over 90%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available