4.7 Article

In Vitro Methodologies to Study the Role of Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs) in Neurodegeneration

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14020363

Keywords

advanced glycation end products; AGEs; neuro-immune axis; inflammation; neurodegeneration; neuroinflammation; blood-brain barrier; in vitro models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review explores the potential role of AGEs in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, discussing in vitro methodologies, current findings, and challenges in the research field. The article provides an overview of the concepts linking AGEs to neurodegeneration and highlights the need for further research to elucidate their underlying modes of action.
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) can be present in food or be endogenously produced in biological systems. Their formation has been associated with chronic neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The implication of AGEs in neurodegeneration is related to their ability to bind to AGE-specific receptors and the ability of their precursors to induce the so-called dicarbonyl stress, resulting in cross-linking and protein damage. However, the mode of action underlying their role in neurodegeneration remains unclear. While some research has been carried out in observational clinical studies, further in vitro studies may help elucidate these underlying modes of action. This review presents and discusses in vitro methodologies used in research on the potential role of AGEs in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. The overview reveals the main concepts linking AGEs to neurodegeneration, the current findings, and the available and advisable in vitro models to study their role. Moreover, the major questions regarding the role of AGEs in neurodegenerative diseases and the challenges and discrepancies in the research field are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available