4.7 Article

The Effect of Dietary Polyphenols on Vascular Health and Hypertension: Current Evidence and Mechanisms of Action

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14030545

Keywords

polyphenols; flavonoids; phenolic acids; hypertension; blood pressure; endothelial

Funding

  1. Piano di incentivi per la ricerca di Ateneo 2020/2022 of the University of Catania, Italy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review examines the effects of dietary polyphenols on vascular health, blood pressure, and hypertension. Evidence suggests that certain polyphenol-rich foods, such as berries, cocoa, green tea, almonds, pistachios, and soy products, can improve blood pressure levels. However, there are limitations to consider, such as the variability of polyphenol content and absorption in plant-derived foods, as well as differences in dosages between animal and human studies.
The aim of this review was to explore existing evidence from studies conducted on humans and summarize the mechanisms of action of dietary polyphenols on vascular health, blood pressure and hypertension. There is evidence that some polyphenol-rich foods, including berry fruits rich in anthocyanins, cocoa and green tea rich in flavan-3-ols, almonds and pistachios rich in hydroxycinnamic acids, and soy products rich in isoflavones, are able to improve blood pressure levels. A variety of mechanisms can elucidate the observed effects. Some limitations of the evidence, including variability of polyphenol content in plant-derived foods and human absorption, difficulty disentangling the effects of polyphenols from other dietary compounds, and discrepancy of doses between animal and human studies should be taken into account. While no single food counteracts hypertension, adopting a plant-based dietary pattern including a variety of polyphenol-rich foods is an advisable practice to improve blood pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available