4.7 Article

Urinary Sodium Excretion and Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Older Adults

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14010061

Keywords

elderly; Mediterranean Diet; salt; sodium

Funding

  1. European Economic Area (EEA)
  2. Faculdade de Ciencias da Nutricao e Alimentacao, Universidade do Porto (FCNAUP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed data from elderly Portuguese adults and found that a high adherence to the Mediterranean Diet was associated with excessive sodium excretion in men, highlighting the importance of implementing strategies to reduce sodium intake for those following a Mediterranean Diet.
Despite the well-known benefits of the Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet), data on the sodium intake is scarce. This study aimed to quantify the association between sodium excretion and the adherence to the MedDiet in the elderly. A representative sample of 1500 Portuguese adults (>= 65 years) was assessed (1321 were eligible for the present analysis). A 24 h urine sample was collected and analysed for creatinine and sodium. Excessive sodium intake was defined as above 2000 mg/day. The adherence to the MedDiet was assessed by the PREDIMED. A binary logistic regression model was conducted to evaluate the association between urinary sodium excretion and the adherence to the MedDiet. Odds Ratios (OR) and respective 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Excessive sodium excretion was observed in 80.0% of men and 91.5% of women whereas a high adherence to the MedDiet was reported by 42.2% of women and 46.4% of men. After adjusting for confounders, excessive sodium excretion was associated with a high adherence to the MedDiet in men (OR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.03-3.65) but not in women. These results show that the MedDiet can be an important source of sodium and highlight the need for implementing strategies to reduce sodium intake when following a MedDiet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available