Journal
NUCLEIC ACID THERAPEUTICS
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 83-94Publisher
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/nat.2021.0039
Keywords
antisense oligonucleotides; n-of-1; rare diseases; rare neurological diseases; regulatory; policy; ethics
Funding
- European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [779257]
- DFG [441409627]
- Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [01GM1905]
- National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke [R01NS072248]
- European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Neurological Diseases-Project [739510]
- Department of Human Genetics of the LUMC
- COST Action [17103]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
ASO therapies offer a promising disease-modifying approach for rare neurological diseases, but there is a need to focus on ultrarare or private variants to provide treatment for a larger share of patients. The emerging field of n-of-1 ASO treatment approaches requires systematic guidance and standards to allow global scaling, particularly in the European context. Genetic, regulatory, and ethical perspectives are essential for preparing and implementing n-of-1 ASO treatments to ensure both individual patient benefit and knowledge gain.
Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapies present a promising disease-modifying treatment approach for rare neurological diseases (RNDs). However, the current focus is on more common RNDs, leaving a large share of RND patients still without prospect of disease-modifying treatments. In response to this gap, n-of-1 ASO treatment approaches are targeting ultrarare or even private variants. While highly attractive, this emerging, academia-driven field of ultimately individualized precision medicine is in need of systematic guidance and standards, which will allow global scaling of this approach. We provide here genetic, regulatory, and ethical perspectives for preparing n-of-1 ASO treatments and research programs, with a specific focus on the European context. By example of splice modulating ASOs, we outline genetic criteria for variant prioritization, chart the regulatory field of n-of-1 ASO treatment development in Europe, and propose an ethically informed classification for n-of-1 ASO treatment strategies and level of outcome assessments. To accommodate the ethical requirements of both individual patient benefit and knowledge gain, we propose a stronger integration of patient care and clinical research when developing novel n-of-1 ASO treatments: each single trial of therapy should inherently be driven to generate generalizable knowledge, be registered in a ASO treatment registry, and include assessment of generic outcomes, which allow aggregated analysis across n-of-1 trials of therapy.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available