4.8 Article

Risk transfer policies and climate-induced immobility among smallholder farmers

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 1046-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01205-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Policy Research on Energy and the Environment at Princeton University
  2. Young Summer Scientists Program at the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis
  3. National Academy of Sciences
  4. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [752-2020-077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Smallholder farmers will be significantly affected by climate change, requiring adaptations. Interventions like cash transfers and risk transfer mechanisms can lead to increased migration and cash crop adoption, resulting in higher income and lower inequality. Results may vary depending on contextual factors such as risk preferences and climate risk exposure.
Smallholder farmers will be impacted substantially by climate change and need to adapt. Agent-based modelling shows that interventions, particularly cash transfer paired with risk transfer mechanisms, lead to increased migration and uptake of cash crops, with higher income and lower inequality. Climate change is anticipated to impact smallholder farmer livelihoods substantially. However, empirical evidence is inconclusive regarding how increased climate stress affects smallholder farmers' deployment of various livelihood strategies, including rural-urban migration. Here we use an agent-based model to show that in a South Asian agricultural community experiencing a 1.5 C-o temperature increase by 2050, climate impacts are likely to decrease household income in 2050 by an average of 28%, with fewer households investing in both economic migration and cash crops, relative to a stationary climate. Pairing a small cash transfer with risk transfer mechanisms significantly increases the adoption of migration and cash crops, improves community incomes and reduces community inequality. While specific results depend on contextual factors such as risk preferences and climate risk exposure, these interventions are robust in improving adaptation outcomes and alleviating immobility, by addressing the intersection of risk aversion, financial constraints and climate impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available