4.6 Review

Hydrogel, Electrospun and Composite Materials for Bone/Cartilage and Neural Tissue Engineering

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14226899

Keywords

scaffolds; tissue engineering; polymers; electrospun nanofibers; hydrogels; nanoparticles; composites; injectable materials

Funding

  1. Narodowe Centrum Nauki (NCN) [2018/29/N/ST8/00780, POWR.03.02.00-00-1028/17-00]
  2. European Social Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Injuries to bone/cartilage and the central nervous system remain a significant socio-economic issue due to the complex tissue structures and regeneration mechanisms involved. Current commercially available materials only partially solve the problem, necessitating the design of novel scaffolds with improved mechanical properties, biochemical cues, and biodegradation for complete tissue regeneration. Recent advancements in bone/cartilage and neural tissue engineering offer hope for the development of scaffolds that can support comprehensive tissue restoration.
Injuries of the bone/cartilage and central nervous system are still a serious socio-economic problem. They are an effect of diversified, difficult-to-access tissue structures as well as complex regeneration mechanisms. Currently, commercially available materials partially solve this problem, but they do not fulfill all of the bone/cartilage and neural tissue engineering requirements such as mechanical properties, biochemical cues or adequate biodegradation. There are still many things to do to provide complete restoration of injured tissues. Recent reports in bone/cartilage and neural tissue engineering give high hopes in designing scaffolds for complete tissue regeneration. This review thoroughly discusses the advantages and disadvantages of currently available commercial scaffolds and sheds new light on the designing of novel polymeric scaffolds composed of hydrogels, electrospun nanofibers, or hydrogels loaded with nano-additives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available