4.6 Article

Life Cycle Assessment and Impact Correlation Analysis of Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14237375

Keywords

geopolymer concrete; compressive strength; grey relational analysis; multivariate analysis of variance; CO2 emission

Funding

  1. Department of Civil Engineering of Sichuan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that the use of geopolymer concrete can significantly reduce CO2 emissions and has minimal impact on compressive strength. Among the key parameters, sodium hydroxide concentration has the greatest impact on compressive strength, while the alkali activator solution to fly ash ratio has the greatest impact on CO2 emissions.
Geopolymer concrete (GPC) has drawn widespread attention as a universally accepted ideal green material to improve environmental conditions in recent years. The present study systematically quantifies and compares the environmental impact of fly ash GPC and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete under different strength grades by conducting life cycle assessment (LCA). The alkali activator solution to fly ash ratio (S/F), sodium hydroxide concentration (C-NaOH), and sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratio (SS/SH) were further used as three key parameters to consider their sensitivity to strength and CO2 emissions. The correlation and influence rules were analyzed by Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) and Gray Relational Analysis (GRA). The results indicated that the CO2 emission of GPC can be reduced by 62.73%, and the correlation between CO2 emission and compressive strength is not significant for GPC. The degree of influence of the three factors on the compressive strength is C-NaOH (66.5%) > SS/SH (20.7%) > S/F (9%) and on CO2 emissions is S/F (87.2%) > SS/SH (10.3%) > C-NaOH (2.4%). Fly ash GPC effectively controls the environmental deterioration without compromising its compressive strength; in fact, it even in favor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available