4.6 Article

An approach for reducing undesired vibrations in milling of low rigidity structures

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-8804-0

Keywords

Machining vibrations; Thin wall; Flexible workpiece

Funding

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A considerable amount of research has focused on machining dynamics due to the impact it lays upon productivity and quality. Models have been developed with an ever-increasing accuracy in order to predict the dynamic behavior of cutting tools under different circumstances. However, workpiece behavior during machining is also a current limiting factor which is dealt with by means of restricting product designers of using features with thin characteristics. For this reason, designed products will be often oversized due to machining technology restrictions related to dimensions of thin walls. The main objective of this work is to investigate the behavior of thin walls during milling in order to identify the challenges imposed by the process. Different strategies are tested and evaluated through force signals, finite element analysis (FEA), analytical models, and analysis of the machined parts. The effect of cutting speed on cutting force is investigated from a force and excitation frequency standpoint. A method for prediction of resonance based on a frequency chart is proposed, for which variable speed tests are conducted. This variable speed approach is based on prediction of stable paths as machining progresses by means of the proposed chart. Validation of the frequency chart construction method is presented along with its applicability and restrictions considering a more complex geometry. Results indicate that the frequency chart method can be used to predict and explain the occurrence of instability but limiting factors still lie in implementing and improving the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available