4.6 Article

Rheological Behaviour of Cementitious Materials Incorporating Solid-Solid Phase Change Materials

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15010020

Keywords

phase change materials; cementitious materials; rheology

Funding

  1. CY Initiative of Excellence (grant Investissements d'Avenir) [ANR16-IDEX-0008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research has shown that the addition of solid-solid phase change materials (s/s PCMs) affects the rheological behavior of construction materials. The s/s PCMs have a significant impact on consistency and yield strength values. By modifying existing viscosity models, the consistency value of suspensions can be predicted, providing a new approach for the use of s/s PCMs in construction materials.
Nowadays, thermal regulation of the indoor environment is mandatory to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The incorporation of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) and especially solid-solid PCMs (s/s PCMs) into building materials can be a major step forward in reducing energy consumption. Such materials are used for their high latent heat to save and release heat during phase change. To integrate these products in the fabrication of cementitious materials, it is essential to predict their influence on the rheological behaviour of construction materials. In this work, rheological measurements were carried out on composite suspensions made of cement or mortar plus s/s PCMs. Results showed that the fitting of the Herschel-Bulkley model with a constant value of flow exponent was reliable. The s/s PCMs influenced the consistency and the yield strength values, with the yield strength value being only slightly affected. The adaptation of an existing viscosity model is proposed to predict the consistency value of suspensions. Finally, an innovative approach to predict the flow behaviour is proposed and we highlight the research needs to mainstream the use of s/s PCMs in construction materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available