4.6 Article

Requirements for Processing High-Strength AlZnMgCu Alloys with PBF-LB/M to Achieve Crack-Free and Dense Parts

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14237190

Keywords

grain refinement; crack reduction; laser beam melting; aluminum alloy; titanium carbide; nanoparticle; PBF-LB; M

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to improve the hot cracking issues of aluminum alloy 7075 during PBF-LB/M process by adding titanium carbide nanoparticles as nucleating agents, which resulted in refined microstructure and crack-free samples with high strength. The two-step ageing heat treatment further enhanced the ultimate tensile strengths and elongation at break. Additionally, it was found that not all nanoparticles used remained in the melt pool during PBF-LB/M process.
Processing aluminum alloys employing powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) is becoming more attractive for the industry, especially if lightweight applications are needed. Unfortunately, high-strength aluminum alloys such as AA7075 are prone to hot cracking during PBF-LB/M, as well as welding. Both a large solidification range promoted by the alloying elements zinc and copper and a high thermal gradient accompanied with the manufacturing process conditions lead to or favor hot cracking. In the present study, a simple method for modifying the powder surface with titanium carbide nanoparticles (NPs) as a nucleating agent is aimed. The effect on the microstructure with different amounts of the nucleating agent is shown. For the aluminum alloy 7075 with 2.5 ma% titanium carbide nanoparticles, manufactured via PBF-LB/M, crack-free samples with a refined microstructure having no discernible melt pool boundaries and columnar grains are observed. After using a two-step ageing heat treatment, ultimate tensile strengths up to 465 MPa and an 8.9% elongation at break are achieved. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that not all nanoparticles used remain in the melt pool during PBF-LB/M.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available