4.6 Article

Hedysarum coronarium-Based Green Composites Prepared by Compression Molding and Fused Deposition Modeling

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15020465

Keywords

green composites; biocomposites; FDM; biopolymers; Mater-Bi; natural filler; additive manufacturing; 3D printing

Funding

  1. University of Palermo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An innovative green composite was produced by adding Hedysarum coronarium flour to a starch-based biodegradable polymer. The influence of filler content on processability, morphology, and mechanical properties of the composites was investigated. The results showed that FDM samples had higher mechanical properties compared to CM ones, and the filler effectively acted as reinforcement in the composites.
In this work, an innovative green composite was produced by adding Hedysarum coronarium (HC) flour to a starch-based biodegradable polymer (Mater-Bi(R), MB). The flour was obtained by grinding together stems, leaves and flowers and subsequently sieving it, selecting a fraction from 75 mu m to 300 mu m. Four formulations have been produced by compression molding (CM) and fused deposition modeling (FDM) by adding 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% of HC to MB. The influence of filler content on the processability was tested, and rheological, morphological and mechanical properties of composites were also assessed. Through CM, it was possible to obtain easily homogeneous samples with all filler amounts. Concerning FDM, 5% and 10% HC-filled composites proved also easily printable. Mechanical results showed filler effectively acted as reinforcement: Young's modulus and tensile strengths of the composites increased from 74.3 MPa to 236 MPa and from 18.6 MPa to 33.4 MPa, respectively, when 20% of HC was added to the pure matrix. FDM samples, moreover, showed higher mechanical properties if compared with CM ones due to rectilinear infill and fibers orientation. In fact, regarding the 10% HC composites, Young's modulus of the CM and FDM ones displayed a relative increment of 176% and 224%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available