4.6 Article

Assessment of the Hardening Behavior and Tensile Properties of a Cold-Rolled Bainitic-Ferritic Steel

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14216662

Keywords

dual-phase steel; advanced high-strength steel; cold rolling; bainitic-ferritic steel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual-phase steels made of ferrite and bainite are important in mechanical characterization, competing with traditional single-phase steels. The hardening behavior of ferrite and bainite is separately analyzed using the Crussard-Jaoul analysis, while the Voce equation evaluates dislocation density evolution.
The automotive field is continuously researching safer, high-strength, ductile materials. Nowadays, dual-phase (DP) steels are gaining importance, since they meet all these requirements. Dual-phase steel made of ferrite and bainite is the object of a complete microstructural and mechanical characterization, which includes tensile and bending tests. This specific steel contains ferrite and bainite in equal parts; ferrite is the soft phase while bainite acts as a dispersed reinforcing system. This peculiar microstructure, together with fine dispersed carbides, an extremely low carbon content (0.09 wt%), and a minimal degree of strain hardening (less than 10%) allow this steel to compete with traditional medium-carbon single-phase steels. In this work, a full pearlitic C67 steel containing 0.67% carbon was used as a benchmark to build a comparative study between the DP and SP steels. Moreover, the Crussard-Jaoul (C-J) and Voce analysis were adopted to describe the hardening behavior of the two materials. Using the C-J analysis, it is possible to separately analyze the ferrite and bainite strain hardening and understand which alterations occur to DP steel after being cold rolled. On the other hand, the Voce equation was used to evaluate the dislocation density evolution as a function of the material state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available