4.6 Article

A Novel Algorithm for Thickness Prediction in Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15031201

Keywords

incremental sheet metal forming; thickness prediction; model; NURBS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Incremental sheet metal forming, characterized by increased flexibility and local plastic deformation, is suitable for low-production-run manufacturing and the trial production of complex shapes. However, thickness thinning remains an obstacle to its application. This study proposes a novel mathematical algorithm based on NURBS surface, which effectively predicts and calculates the final thickness of arbitrary parts in incremental forming. The proposed model is validated through finite element simulation and forming experiments, showing good agreement with the theoretical predictions.
Incremental sheet metal forming characterized as increased flexibility and local plastic deformation is well suitable for low-production-run manufacturing and a new sample trial production of complex shapes. Thickness thinning is still an obstacle to the application of incremental forming. In this study, a novel mathematical algorithm based on a non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) surface was proposed and implemented which focuses on predicting and calculating the final thickness for arbitrary parts in incremental forming. In order to evaluate the validity of the proposed model, the finite element simulation and forming experiments of three kinds of parts, such as truncated cones, truncated pyramids and ellipsoid parts, were conducted. The thickness of theoretical prediction was compared with that of finite element simulation and experiment, and good agreements were obtained. The results show that the proposed model and the method are effective and robust for predicting the thickness of the formed parts in incremental sheet metal forming.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available