4.6 Article

A Comparative Study on the Temperature Effect of Solid Birch Wood and Solid Beech Wood under Impact Loading

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14247616

Keywords

energy absorption; impact loading; solid beech wood; solid birch wood; temperature-effects

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the impact behavior of solid birch wood and solid beech wood at different temperature levels. It found that deceleration forces were highest at temperatures at and below zero in both wood types. While the impact bending energy of solid birch wood remained relatively constant over the temperature range, solid beech wood exhibited greater variability and scattering.
In order to use wood for structural and load-bearing purposes in mechanical engineering, basic information on the impact behaviour of the material over a wide temperature range is needed. Diffuse porous hardwoods such as solid birch wood (Betula pendula) and solid beech wood (Fagus sylvatica) are particularly suited for the production of engineered wood products (EWPs) such as laminated veneer lumber (LVL) or plywood due to their processability in a veneer peeling process. In the frame of this study, solid birch wood and solid beech wood samples (300 x 20 x 20 mm(3)) were characterised by means of an impact pendulum test setup (working capacity of 150 J) at five temperature levels, ranging from -30 degrees C to +90 degrees C. The pendulum hammer (mass = 15 kg) was equipped with an acceleration sensor in order to obtain the acceleration pulse and deceleration force besides the impact bending energy. In both solid birch wood and solid beech wood, the deceleration forces were highest at temperatures at and below zero. While the average impact bending energy for solid birch wood remained almost constant over the whole considered temperature range, it was far less stable and prone to higher scattering for solid beech wood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available