4.6 Article

Effects of Preparation Procedures and Porosity on Thermoelectric Bulk Samples of Cu2SnS3 (CTS)

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15030712

Keywords

copper tin sulfide; Cu2SnS3; CTS; thermal stability; chalcogenide; material production; porosity; porous thermoelectric materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the thermoelectric behavior and stability of Cu2SnS3 (CTS) and reveals the influence of preparation and sintering conditions on material properties. Different preparations of CTS samples show similar electrical transport characteristics, but sintering conditions significantly affect the thermal conductivity and thermoelectric performance of the material.
The thermoelectric behavior and stability of Cu2SnS3 (CTS) has been investigated in relation to different preparations and sintering conditions, leading to different microstructures and porosities. The studied system is CTS in its cubic polymorph, produced in powder form via a bottom-up approach based on high-energy reactive milling. The as-milled powder was sintered in two batches with different synthesis conditions to produce bulk CTS samples: manual cold pressing followed by traditional sintering (TS), or open die pressing (ODP). Despite the significant differences in densities, ~75% and ~90% of the theoretical density for TS and ODP, respectively, we observed no significant difference in electrical transport. The stable, best performing TS samples reached zT ~0.45, above 700 K, whereas zT reached ~0.34 for the best performing ODP in the same conditions. The higher zT of the TS sintered sample is due to the ultra-low thermal conductivity (kappa ~0.3-0.2 W/mK), three-fold lower than ODP in the entire measured temperature range. The effect of porosity and production conditions on the transport properties is highlighted, which could pave the way to produce high-performing TE materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available