4.5 Article

Modelling climate change impact on water resources of the Upper Indus Basin

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 482-504

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2021.233

Keywords

climate change; GCMs; precipitation; SWAT; temperature; water balance

Funding

  1. Punjab Higher Education Commission (PHEC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study indicates that climate change will have significant impacts on water balance components in sub-basins of the Upper Indus Basin, particularly affecting seasonal river flows and having important implications for water supplies.
Climate change has implications for water resources by increasing temperature, shifting precipitation patterns and altering the timing of snowfall and glacier melt, leading to shifts in the seasonality of river flows. Here, the Soil & Water Assessment Tool was run using downscaled precipitation and temperature projections from five global climate models (GCMs) and their multi-model mean to estimate the potential impact of climate change on water balance components in sub-basins of the Upper Indus Basin (UIB) under two emission (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) and future (2020-2050 and 2070-2100) scenarios. Warming of above 6 degrees C relative to baseline (1974-2004) is projected for the UIB by the end of the century (2070-2100), but the spread of annual precipitation projections among GCMs is large (+16 to -28%), and even larger for seasonal precipitation (+91 to -48%). Compared to the baseline, an increase in summer precipitation (RCP8.5: +36.7%) and a decrease in winter precipitation were projected (RCP8.5: -16.9%), with an increase in average annual water yield from the nival-glacial regime and river flow peaking 1 month earlier. We conclude that predicted warming during winter and spring could substantially affect the seasonal river flows, with important implications for water supplies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available