4.7 Article

Steroid pretreatment of deceased donors and liver allograft function-Ten years follow-up of a blinded randomized placebo controlled trial

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106095

Keywords

Liver transplantation; Donor steroid pretreatment; Outcomes

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate the effect of donor steroid pretreatment on liver transplantation outcomes, and found no significant impact on patient and graft survival, acute rejection rates, or short and long-term graft function trajectories.
Background: Within the last decade numerous attempts have been reported in order to expand the donor pool and alleviate organ shortage in the setting of liver transplantation. Aim of this blinded randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effect of donor steroid pretreatment on outcomes after liver transplantation. Methods: We performed an international, multi-center double-blinded randomized placebo controlled trial. Donors received 1000 mg methylprednisone or placebo before organ procurement. Primary endpoint were patient and graft survival. Secondary end points were rate of BPAR and liver functions trajectories after transplantation. Follow up was 10 years. Results: There was no effect of steroid pretreatment vs. placebo on overall patient survival (50% vs. 46%, p = n.s.) as well as graft survival (47% vs. 51%, p= n.s.). Further donor steroid pretreatment did not alter the rate of biopsy proven acute rejections (34% steroid group vs. 36% placebo, p = n.s.). Evaluating short term and long term graft function, steroid pretreatment had minor effect on immediate liver function trajectories within the first 2 weeks after transplantation. This was not seen in long-term follow up. Conclusion: In conclusion we found no evidence that donor steroid pretreatment translates in improved outcomes after liver transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available