4.5 Article

Rural areas electrification strategies through shadow costs analysis-Bolivian Highlands case study

Journal

ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 162-174

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2021.10.009

Keywords

Rural electrification; Grid extension; Solar home systems; Electricity demand; Electrification costs; Grid routing

Funding

  1. Enel Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the use of standalone solutions like Solar Home Systems in the last-mile electrification of rural communities, questioning the paradigm and proposing alternative approaches that include penalty based on missed services. Results from a case study in Cochabamba, Bolivia, show how incorporating shadow costs can influence optimal electrification strategy, increasing the percentage of users connected to the main grid.
In the context of last-mile electrification of rural communities, stand-alone solutions like Solar Home Systems are often considered an equivalent option for access to electricity as other technologies, such as minigrids and connection to the main grid. In this work, the authors question this paradigm and propose an alternative approach that takes into account the limited service, and in turn, limited development possibilities, that Solar Home Systems grant to their users. A monetary penalty is applied to this technology based on the missed services. The conceived approach is applied to a case study in the district of Cochabamba, Bolivia, thanks to the cooperation with a local NGO. Results show how the inclusion of shadow costs influences the optimal electrification strategy in terms of users connected to the main grid by up to 33%, highlighting how standard approaches tend to overlook key aspects of access to electricity linked to the possibility of development. (c) 2021 International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available