4.4 Review

Implicit Cognition Tests for the Assessment of Suicide Risk: a Systematic Review

Journal

CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 141-159

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-022-01316-5

Keywords

Suicide; Suicide attempt; Suicide ideation; Implicit; Cognition; Assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [ISCIII PI13/02200, PI16/01852, CM19/00026]
  2. American Foundation for Suicide Prevention [LSRG-1-005-16]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation [RTI2018099655B-I00, TEC2017-92552-EXP]
  4. regional government of Madrid [Y2018/TCS-4705, PEJD-2018-PRE/SAL8417]
  5. European Social Fund through the Operational Program on Youth Employment
  6. Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) [PEJD-2018-PRE/SAL8417]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article systematically reviews the validity and reliability of implicit tests for assessing suicide risk. The findings suggest that these measures are generally effective in assessing past and future suicidal thoughts and behaviors, with statistically significant results in retrospective and prospective associations.
Purpose of Review Suicide risk assessment is a challenge in clinical practice. Implicit measures may present with advantages with respect to explicit methods, and therefore may be useful for the assessment of suicide risk. We conducted a systematic review of 2 databases (PubMed and EMBASE) about implicit tests that measure suicide risk to explore their validity and reliability. Recent Findings Initial research revealed 321 articles. After the selection process, 31 articles were included in the review. The most death-related implicit cognition test used was the Death/Suicide Implicit association test (D/S IAT), followed by the Suicide Stroop Task. The Suicide Affect Misattribution Procedure (S-AMP) and the Death version of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (D-IRAP) were also used. Summary We found that the measures reviewed were generally valid for the assessment of past and future suicidal thoughts and behaviors, with statistically significant results regarding retrospective and prospective associations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available