4.5 Article

Influence of drug safety advisories on drug utilisation: an international interrupted time series and meta-analysis

Journal

BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 179-190

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013910

Keywords

health policy; health services research; medication safety; pharmacoepidemiology

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [PJT--153275]
  2. Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council [1122332]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1122332] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the association between regulatory drug safety advisories and changes in drug utilisation in four countries (Canada, Denmark, the UK, and the USA) from 2009 to 2015. The results showed that the impact of drug safety advisories on drug utilisation was variable, with an overall modest association.
Objective To evaluate the association between regulatory drug safety advisories and changes in drug utilisation. Design We conducted controlled, interrupted times series analyses with administrative prescription claims data to estimate changes in drug utilisation following advisories. We used random-effects meta-analysis with inverse-variance weighting to estimate the average postadvisory change in drug utilisation across advisories. Study population We included advisories issued in Canada, Denmark, the UK and the USA during 2009-2015, mainly concerning drugs in common use in primary care. We excluded advisories related to over-the-counter drugs, drug-drug interactions, vaccines, drugs used primarily in hospital and advisories with co-interventions within +/- 6 months. Main outcome measures Change in drug utilisation, defined as actual versus predicted percentage change in the number of prescriptions (for advisories without dose-related advice), or in the number of defined daily doses (for dose-related advisories), per 100 000 population. Results Among advisories without dose-related advice (n=20), the average change in drug utilisation was -5.83% (95% CI -10.93 to -0.73; p=0.03). Advisories with dose-related advice (n=4) were not associated with a statistically significant change in drug utilisation (-1.93%; 95% CI -17.10 to 13.23; p=0.80). In a post hoc subgroup analysis of advisories without dose-related advice, we observed no statistically significant difference between the change in drug utilisation following advisories with explicit prescribing advice, such as a recommendation to consider the risk of a drug when prescribing, and the change in drug utilisation following advisories without such advice. Conclusions Among safety advisories issued on a wide range of drugs during 2009-2015 in 4 countries (Canada, Denmark, the UK and the USA), the association of advisories with changes in drug utilisation was variable, and the average association was modest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available