4.6 Article

Quality analysis combined with mass spectrometry imaging reveal the difference between wild and cultivated Phyllanthus emblica Linn.: From chemical composition to molecular mechanism

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.103790

Keywords

Phyllanthus emblica; Sensory analysis; Metabonomics; Wild; Cultivated

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81973493]
  2. Study and Research Joint Laboratory Project of Chengdu University of TCM [2019-YF04-00086-JH]
  3. National interdisciplinary innovation team project [ZYYCXTD-D-202209]
  4. Sichuan Province Science and Technology Plan Funded Project [2021YFN0100]
  5. Innovative Institute of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy of Chengdu University of TCM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the quality of Phyllanthus emblica using a comprehensive taste index and odor component analysis method, and revealed the formation mechanism of quality difference through mass spectrometry imaging and metabolomics.
In this paper, the quality of Phyllanthus emblica was evaluated by establishing a compre-hensive taste index and odor component analysis method, and the formation mechanism of quality difference was revealed by mass spectrometry imaging and metabolomics. Studies have found that the representative substances of bitterness and astringency in cultivated PE, such as amlaic acid, kaempferol, quercetin and their derivatives, have higher content. Compared with wild PE, culti-vated PE has a very lower 2-Isobutyl-3-methoxypyrazine content, a kind of odor molecule that destroys the fruits flavor. Biological activity studies showed that the biological activity of wild PE was stronger than cultivated PE. Mass spectrometry imaging revealed significant differences in the distribution of multiple components between the two types of PE. Metabonomic studies show that their quality differences may be related to the difference of flavonoids and flavonol biosynthesis in PE.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available