4.6 Article

Solute Segregation to Grain Boundaries in Al: A First-Principles Evaluation

Journal

ACTA METALLURGICA SINICA-ENGLISH LETTERS
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 1572-1582

Publisher

CHINESE ACAD SCIENCES, INST METAL RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1007/s40195-022-01383-w

Keywords

Al alloy; Grain boundary; Segregation; Vacancy; Solute; First-principles

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971249]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2020KE012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically investigates the segregation behaviors of solute elements in Al alloys and their effects on grain boundary binding using first-principles energetics. The results show that solute elements can either enhance or weaken the grain boundary strength, and this effect is always mitigated to some extent by segregated vacancies at the grain boundary.
Solute-induced grain boundary (GB) strengthening is effective in improving the toughness and tensile strength of polycrystalline alloys. In this work, GB segregation behaviors of solute elements in Al alloys and their potential effects on GB binding have been systematically investigated from first-principles energetics. The low-energy sigma 3(111) and sigma 11(113) are immune to vacancy segregation, while high-energy Al GBs, such as sigma 13(320), sigma 9(221), sigma 5(210), and sigma 5(310), can attract both vacancies and solutes. Under-sized elements (Ni, Fe, Co, Cu) and similar-sized elements (Si, Zn, Ag, and Ti) prefer interstitial or vacancy sites at the GB interface, while over-sized elements (Mg, Zr, Sc, Er) tend to substitute Al or vacancy-neighboring sites at the GB interface. Segregated vacancies weaken GBs. Under-sized Ni, Co, Cu, similar-sized Ti, and over-sized Zr, Er, can directly enhance Al GBs, while similar-sized Ag and over-sized Mg reduce the GB binding strength. Solute strengthening or weakening effects tend to be always mitigated, more or less, by GB-segregated vacancies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available