4.8 Article

Specific length and structure rather than high thermodynamic stability enable regulatory mRNA stem-loops to pause translation

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28600-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institute of Health [R01GM099719, R35GM141812, R01GM076485]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that specific length and structure, rather than high thermodynamic stability, are crucial for regulatory mRNA stem-loops to pause translation. These findings provide insights into the identification of new regulatory mRNA stem-loops.
This study shows that rather than high thermodynamic stability, specific length and structure enable regulatory mRNA stem-loops to pause translation. These findings aid identification of new regulatory mRNA stem-loops. Translating ribosomes unwind mRNA secondary structures by three basepairs each elongation cycle. Despite the ribosome helicase, certain mRNA stem-loops stimulate programmed ribosomal frameshift by inhibiting translation elongation. Here, using mutagenesis, biochemical and single-molecule experiments, we examine whether high stability of three basepairs, which are unwound by the translating ribosome, is critical for inducing ribosome pauses. We find that encountering frameshift-inducing mRNA stem-loops from the E. coli dnaX mRNA and the gag-pol transcript of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) hinders A-site tRNA binding and slows down ribosome translocation by 15-20 folds. By contrast, unwinding of first three basepairs adjacent to the mRNA entry channel slows down the translating ribosome by only 2-3 folds. Rather than high thermodynamic stability, specific length and structure enable regulatory mRNA stem-loops to stall translation by forming inhibitory interactions with the ribosome. Our data provide the basis for rationalizing transcriptome-wide studies of translation and searching for novel regulatory mRNA stem-loops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available