4.8 Article

Sources of confidence in value-based choice

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27618-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC)
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [758604]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [758604] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that confidence in value-based decisions is influenced by endogenous attentional effort and downstream noise in the comparison process, rather than by fluctuations in the precision of value encoding.
Confidence, the subjective estimate of decision quality, is a cognitive process necessary for learning from mistakes and guiding future actions. The origins of confidence judgments resulting from economic decisions remain unclear. We devise a task and computational framework that allowed us to formally tease apart the impact of various sources of confidence in value-based decisions, such as uncertainty emerging from encoding and decoding operations, as well as the interplay between gaze-shift dynamics and attentional effort. In line with canonical decision theories, trial-to-trial fluctuations in the precision of value encoding impact economic choice consistency. However, this uncertainty has no influence on confidence reports. Instead, confidence is associated with endogenous attentional effort towards choice alternatives and down-stream noise in the comparison process. These findings provide an explanation for confidence (miss)attributions in value-guided behaviour, suggesting mechanistic influences of endogenous attentional states for guiding decisions and metacognitive awareness of choice certainty. The authors show that metacognitive awareness of choice certainty is closely linked to endogenous attentional states that guide decision behaviour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available