4.8 Article

The DNA methylome of cervical cells can predict the presence of ovarian cancer

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26615-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
  2. H2020 FORECEE [634570]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 European Research Council Programme,
  4. H2020 BRCA-ERC [742432]
  5. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  6. University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre
  7. NHS Innovation Accelerator (NIA) Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A DNA methylation signature in Mullerian Duct-derived cervical cells can identify ovarian and endometrial cancer without tumor DNA. The epigenetic programming of cervical cells indicates cancer predisposition, as observed in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. This concept has the potential to advance risk-stratified cancer screening and prevention.
The vast majority of epithelial ovarian cancer arises from tissues that are embryologically derived from the Mullerian Duct. Here, we demonstrate that a DNA methylation signature in easy-to-access Mullerian Duct-derived cervical cells from women with and without ovarian cancer (i.e. referred to as the Women's risk IDentification for Ovarian Cancer index or WID-OC-index) is capable of identifying women with an ovarian cancer in the absence of tumour DNA with an AUC of 0.76 and women with an endometrial cancer with an AUC of 0.81. This and the observation that the cervical cell WID-OC-index mimics the epigenetic program of those cells at risk of becoming cancerous in BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers (i.e. mammary epithelium, fallopian tube fimbriae, prostate) further suggest that the epigenetic misprogramming of cervical cells is an indicator for cancer predisposition. This concept has the potential to advance the field of risk-stratified cancer screening and prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available