4.8 Article

Single-cell normalization and association testing unifying CRISPR screen and gene co-expression analyses with Normalisr

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26682-1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Normalisr is a normalization and statistical association testing framework for single-cell RNA sequencing that achieves high sensitivity, specificity, speed, and generalizability across multiple protocols and conditions. It removes technical bias, accurately detects gene differential and coexpression, and infers gene regulatory and co-expression networks.
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides unprecedented technical and statistical potential to study gene regulation but is subject to technical variations and sparsity. Furthermore, statistical association testing remains difficult for scRNA-seq. Here we present Normalisr, a normalization and statistical association testing framework that unifies single-cell differential expression, co-expression, and CRISPR screen analyses with linear models. By systematically detecting and removing nonlinear confounders arising from library size at mean and variance levels, Normalisr achieves high sensitivity, specificity, speed, and generalizability across multiple scRNA-seq protocols and experimental conditions with unbiased p-value estimation. The superior scalability allows us to reconstruct robust gene regulatory networks from trans-effects of guide RNAs in large-scale single cell CRISPRi screens. On conventional scRNA-seq, Normalisr recovers gene-level co-expression networks that recapitulated known gene functions. Normalisr removes technical bias in single-cell RNA-seq and detects gene differential and coexpression accurately and efficiently. It also infers gene regulatory and co-expression networks from conventional and CRISPR screen single-cell RNA-seq datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available