4.8 Article

Orchestrating and sharing large multimodal data for transparent and reproducible research

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25974-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), under the frame of ERA PerMed
  2. Genome Canada
  3. Ontario Genomics via a Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (B/CB)
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reproducibility is crucial in open science for findings to be valid and shareable. The complexity and growth of biomedical data pose challenges in processing and sharing. ORCESTRA platform tackles this by processing multimodal biomedical data and providing customizable workflows.
Reproducibility is essential to open science, as there is limited relevance for findings that can not be reproduced by independent research groups, regardless of its validity. It is therefore crucial for scientists to describe their experiments in sufficient detail so they can be reproduced, scrutinized, challenged, and built upon. However, the intrinsic complexity and continuous growth of biomedical data makes it increasingly difficult to process, analyze, and share with the community in a FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) manner. To overcome these issues, we created a cloud-based platform called ORCESTRA (orcestra.ca), which provides a flexible framework for the reproducible processing of multimodal biomedical data. It enables processing of clinical, genomic and perturbation profiles of cancer samples through automated processing pipelines that are user-customizable. ORCESTRA creates integrated and fully documented data objects with persistent identifiers (DOI) and manages multiple dataset versions, which can be shared for future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available