4.8 Article

Fast and pervasive diagenetic isotope exchange in foraminifera tests is species-dependent

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27782-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council [788752]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [788752] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates fluid-mediated isotopic exchange in pristine foraminifera tests and finds that even tests considered texturally pristine for paleo-climatic reconstruction purposes may have experienced substantial isotopic exchange, highlighting the need for critical re-examination of paleo-temperature records.
Oxygen isotope compositions of fossil foraminifera tests are commonly used proxies for ocean paleotemperatures, with reconstructions spanning the last 112 million years. However, the isotopic composition of these calcitic tests can be substantially altered during diagenesis without discernible textural changes. Here, we investigate fluid-mediated isotopic exchange in pristine tests of three modern benthic foraminifera species (Ammonia sp., Haynesina germanica, and Amphistegina Iessonii) following immersion into an O-18-enriched artificial seawater at 90 degrees C for hours to days. Reacted tests remain texturally pristine but their bulk oxygen isotope compositions reveal rapid and species-dependent isotopic exchange with the water. NanoSIMS imaging reveals the 3-dimensional intra-test distributions of O-18-enrichment that correlates with test ultra-structure and associated organic matter. Image analysis is used to quantify species level differences in test ultrastructure, which explains the observed species-dependent rates of isotopic exchange. Consequently, even tests considered texturally pristine for paleo-climatic reconstruction purposes may have experienced substantial isotopic exchange; critical paleo-temperature record re-examination is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available