4.8 Article

A cross-sectional analysis of meteorological factors and SARS-CoV-2 transmission in 409 cities across 26 countries

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25914-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council-UK [MR/R013349/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council UK [NE/R009384/1]
  3. European Union [101003688, 820655]
  4. Czech Science Foundation [18-22125S]
  5. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [18411951600]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea (BK21 Center for Integrative Response)
  7. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-001754: M.Q, INV-003174]
  8. NTD Modelling Consortium [OPP1184344, OPP1180644, OPP1183986]
  9. BMGF [OPP1157270]
  10. DFID/Wellcome Trust (Epidemic Preparedness Coronavirus research programme) [221303/Z/20/Z: C.A.B.P.]
  11. ERC [757699]
  12. Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) project 'RECAP'
  13. HDR UK [MR/S003975/1]
  14. MRC [MR/N013638/1, MR/V027956/1]
  15. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) using UK aid from the UK Government
  16. Royal Society (Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship) [RP \EA\180004]
  17. UK DHSC/UK Aid/NIHR [PR-OD-1017-20001]
  18. UK MRC [MR/P014658/1, MC_PC_19065]
  19. UK Public Health Rapid Support Team by United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Care
  20. Wellcome Trust [206250/Z/17/Z, 206471/Z/17/Z, 208812/Z/17/Z, 210758/Z/18/Z, UNS110424, 210758/Z/18/Z210758/Z/18/Z]
  21. LSHTM, DHSC/UKRI COVID-19 Rapid Response Initiative [MR/V028456/1]
  22. Innovation Fund of the Joint Federal Committee [01VSF18015]
  23. Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office/Wellcome Trust [221303/Z/20/Z]
  24. Xunta de Galicia (Spain)
  25. Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship
  26. NIEHS-funded HERCULES Center [P30ES019776]
  27. Health Protection Research Unit for Modelling Methodology [HPRU-2012-10096, NIHR200908, NIHR200929, PR-OD-1017-20002]
  28. NIEHS [P30ES019776]
  29. National Research Foundation of Korea (BK21 Center for Integrative Response to Health Disasters, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University)
  30. ESRC [ES/P010873/1]
  31. EDCTP2 [RIA2020EF-2983-CSIGN]
  32. Nakajima Foundation
  33. Wellcome Trust [221303/Z/20/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  34. MRC [MR/V027956/1, MR/R013349/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  35. NERC [NE/R009384/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  36. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/P010873/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  37. Medical Research Council [MR/V027956/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  38. Wellcome Trust [206471/Z/17/Z, 210758/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  39. National Research Foundation of Korea [4199990514025] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzes data from the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and suggests that while temperature and humidity have a small impact on transmission, the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions outweigh them significantly.
There is conflicting evidence on the influence of weather on COVID-19 transmission. Our aim is to estimate weather-dependent signatures in the early phase of the pandemic, while controlling for socio-economic factors and non-pharmaceutical interventions. We identify a modest non-linear association between mean temperature and the effective reproduction number (R-e) in 409 cities in 26 countries, with a decrease of 0.087 (95% CI: 0.025; 0.148) for a 10 degrees C increase. Early interventions have a greater effect on R-e with a decrease of 0.285 (95% CI 0.223; 0.347) for a 5th - 95th percentile increase in the government response index. The variation in the effective reproduction number explained by government interventions is 6 times greater than for mean temperature. We find little evidence of meteorological conditions having influenced the early stages of local epidemics and conclude that population behaviour and government interventions are more important drivers of transmission. Possible effects of weather conditions on COVID-19 transmission are debated. Here, the authors analyse data from early in the pandemic and show that although temperature and humidity had small effects on transmission, they were far out-weighed by the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available