4.8 Article

Directed evolution of rRNA improves translation kinetics and recombinant protein yield

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25852-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Director's Early Independence Award [DP5-OD-024590]
  2. NASA Exobiology Program [NNH17ZDA001N-EXO]
  3. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ribosome kinetics are rate-limiting for protein synthesis. The authors evolved diverse 16S rRNAs to enhance protein synthesis rates and genetic code expansion efficiencies in vivo.
In bacteria, ribosome kinetics are considered rate-limiting for protein synthesis and cell growth. Enhanced ribosome kinetics may augment bacterial growth and biomanufacturing through improvements to overall protein yield, but whether this can be achieved by ribosome-specific modifications remains unknown. Here, we evolve 16S ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) from Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Vibrio cholerae towards enhanced protein synthesis rates. We find that rRNA sequence origin significantly impacted evolutionary trajectory and generated rRNA mutants with augmented protein synthesis rates in both natural and engineered contexts, including the incorporation of noncanonical amino acids. Moreover, discovered consensus mutations can be ported onto phylogenetically divergent rRNAs, imparting improved translational activities. Finally, we show that increased translation rates in vivo coincide with only moderately reduced translational fidelity, but do not enhance bacterial population growth. Together, these findings provide a versatile platform for development of unnatural ribosomal functions in vivo. Ribosome kinetics are rate-limiting for protein synthesis. Here the authors evolve diverse 16S rRNAs for enhanced protein synthesis rates and genetic code expansion efficiencies in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available