4.8 Article

A supergene underlies linked variation in color and morphology in a Holarctic songbird

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27173-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [15-11782S, 19-22538S]
  2. Society of Systematic Biologists
  3. American Ornithological Society
  4. Denver Field Ornithologists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genetic architecture of a phenotype plays a significant role in the evolution of traits or species. In redpoll finches, a chromosomal inversion appears to control multiple linked traits related to coloration and bill morphology, potentially under environmental selection, maintaining balanced polymorphism. Despite gene flow causing homogenization of the genome, this mechanism helps to explain the maintenance of ecotype variation in redpolls.
The genetic architecture of a phenotype can have considerable effects on the evolution of a trait or species. Characterizing genetic architecture provides insight into the complexity of a given phenotype and, potentially, the role of the phenotype in evolutionary processes like speciation. We use genome sequences to investigate the genetic basis of phenotypic variation in redpoll finches (Acanthis spp.). We demonstrate that variation in redpoll phenotype is broadly controlled by a similar to 55-Mb chromosomal inversion. Within this inversion, we find multiple candidate genes related to melanogenesis, carotenoid coloration, and bill shape, suggesting the inversion acts as a supergene controlling multiple linked traits. A latitudinal gradient in ecotype distribution suggests supergene driven variation in color and bill morphology are likely under environmental selection, maintaining supergene haplotypes as a balanced polymorphism. Our results provide a mechanism for the maintenance of ecotype variation in redpolls despite a genome largely homogenized by gene flow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available