4.8 Article

Prime editing efficiency and fidelity are enhanced in the absence of mismatch repair

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28442-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Austrian Academy of Sciences [OAW25035]
  2. Austrian Science Fund [P33024]
  3. ERC Synergy Grant [855741]
  4. Austrian Academy of Sciences
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P33024] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [855741] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prime editing is a powerful genome engineering approach that can introduce various modifications into the genome. This study identifies the mismatch repair pathway as inhibitory for Prime editing, and loss of mismatch repair enhances its efficiency.
Prime editing (PE) is a powerful genome engineering approach that enables the introduction of base substitutions, insertions and deletions into any given genomic locus. However, the efficiency of PE varies widely and depends not only on the genomic region targeted, but also on the genetic background of the edited cell. Here, to determine which cellular factors affect PE efficiency, we carry out a focused genetic screen targeting 32 DNA repair factors, spanning all reported repair pathways. We show that, depending on cell line and type of edit, ablation of mismatch repair (MMR) affords a 2-17 fold increase in PE efficiency, across several human cell lines, types of edits and genomic loci. The accumulation of the key MMR factors MLH1 and MSH2 at PE sites argues for direct involvement of MMR in PE control. Our results shed new light on the mechanism of PE and suggest how its efficiency might be optimised. Prime Editing is a versatile genome engineering tool. Here, the authors identify the DNA repair pathway known as mismatch repair as inhibitory for Prime Editing, thus, loss of mismatch repair enhances the efficiency of Prime Editing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available