4.5 Article

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel EGFR PROTACs Targeting Del19/T790M/C797S Mutation

Journal

ACS MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 278-283

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00645

Keywords

NSCLC; acquired resistance; EGFR C797S; PROTACs; selectivity

Funding

  1. Shanghai Pujiang Program [19PJ1411400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21807044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of EGFR proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) were designed and synthesized to induce degradation of EGFR C797S mutant in resistant non-small cell lung cancer patients, with compound 6h showing promising degradation and antiproliferation activity.
The tertiary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) C797S mutation predominates in the acquired mutational resistance in cancer patients to third-generation EGFR inhibitors. Small-molecule inhibitors targeting the EGFR C797S mutation have been developed with good efficiency. However, these compounds may still induce new EGFR mutations to evade the inhibition pathway. One EGFR protein degrader based on an allosteric inhibitor has shown some benefits of degrading the EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S triple mutant. However, the degrader of the other important triple EGFR mutation Del19/T790M/C797S has not been reported. Here we present the design and synthesis of a series of EGFR proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) that can rapidly and potently induce EGFR degradation in Ba/F3 cells expressing the EGFR(Del19/T79M/C797S )mutant. One representative compound 6h time- and dose-dependently induced EGFR degradation with a DC50 of 8 nM. It also showed good antiproliferation activity (IC50 = 0.02 mu M) against Ba/F3-EGFR(Del19/T790M/C797S) cells. 6h may serve as a lead compound to develop therapeutic agents for the treatment of resistant non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR C797S mutants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available