4.1 Article

A critical evaluation of crizanlizumab for the treatment of sickle cell disease

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 5-13

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2022.2023007

Keywords

Crizanlizumab; sickle cell disease; pain crisis; P-selectin; SEG101

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crizanlizumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks P-selectin, shows great promise in modulating the natural history of sickle cell disease with potential pleotropic effects. Ongoing studies aim to define its role in preventing other sickle cell-related complications, non-sickle cell inflammatory states, and thrombotic disorders.
Introduction P-selectin is a key adhesion molecule in the pathogenesis of sickle cell disease, including acute painful event(s). Many of the mediators activated in prototypical pain crisis are also involved in other complications seen in this population. Crizanlizumab is a monoclonal antibody approved in the US in 2019 for patients of all genotypes of sickle cell disease. By blocking P-selectin, it effectively prevents acute painful event(s) and has a manageable safety profile. Areas covered In this review, we provide an overview of the (i) biology of P-selectin in sickle cell disease, (ii) various agents inhibiting P-selectin, (iii) pharmacology of crizanlizumab, (iv) preclinical and clinical data on crizanlizumab, and (v) its potential for other indications, ongoing studies, regulatory status, and cost issues. Further, we describe its position among other approved agents in sickle cell disease and project future directions as well. Expert opinion Crizanlizumab holds great promise in modulating the natural history of sickle cell disease and may have pleotropic effects. Studies are ongoing to define its role in preventing other sickle cell-related complications, non-sickle cell inflammatory states, and thrombotic disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available