4.6 Review

Students' view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review

Journal

BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02958-4

Keywords

Co-teaching; Students' satisfaction; Perception; Attitude; View; Medical sciences

Funding

  1. National Agency for Strategic Research in Medical Education (NASR) [981069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supportive co-teaching (SCT) in medical sciences has been positively received by students, who believe it helps them better understand the relationship between basic and clinical sciences, leading to increased engagement and an optimized learning experience.
Background Supportive co-teaching (SCT) is the practice of employing two or more experts whose knowledge and experiences are needed simultaneously to make a connection across different disciplines in a classroom. Although this interdisciplinary approach seems to be beneficial, there are many features which need further examination. This study was conducted to systematically review studies addressing the use of this approach and learners' views on SCT in medical sciences. Methods We searched for the studies addressing students' views on SCT in medical sciences from January1(st) 2000 to June 31st, 2019. All the studies, both quantitative and qualitative published in English language, investigating the students' views on SCT, in non-clinical courses in the setting of medical sciences were included. We searched electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, WHO Global Health Library, Health Systems Evidence, and ERIC with the keywords and phrases related to the topic which were: co-teaching, team teaching, collaborative teaching, peer-to-peer co-teaching, partnership teaching, and teacher collaboration. Results By the initial search, 9806 studies were found and after deletion of duplicates and screening, 111 remained for selection. Upon the independent review by two researchers, we were able to discern 12 studies eligible to be included for data extraction. All the studies reported positive views of the students towards SCT although some identified concerns and drawbacks. The students stated that they could better perceive the relationship between basic and clinical sciences, were more engaged in the learning process, and their learning experience was optimized in a course directed by SCT. Conclusion Overall, the students showed positive views of this approach of teaching, and their grades indicated they learned better than expected. However, mismatch and lack of coordination between instructors would make the class distracting, confusing and even disturbing. Further studies investigating different variables related to teachers and students in SCT classes are suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available