4.5 Review

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes in the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction: a Systematic Review of Preclinical In Vivo Studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 317-339

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12265-021-10168-y

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cell; Exosomes; Angiogenesis; Apoptosis; Systematic review

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81973787]
  2. Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China [2019M660574]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study comprehensively reviewed prior preclinical studies on the utility of MSC-derived exosomes for repairing MI-related tissue injury, demonstrating improved cardiac function, angiogenesis, and decreased apoptotic cell death with exosome treatment. MSC-Exos show beneficial therapeutic efficacy in treating MI injury, but further standardization of experimental preclinical models and validation of results will be necessary.
Several prior studies have highlighted the promise of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as tools for treating myocardial infarction (MI) patients. While MSCs were initially thought to mediate post-MI repair through differentiation and replacement of injured cells, they are now thought to function by releasing exosomes carrying important cargos which can prevent apoptosis and facilitate revascularization in the context of MI. Herein, we comprehensively survey prior preclinical studies examining MSC-derived exosomes (MSC- Exos) utility for the repair of MI-related tissue injury. In total, 24 relevant studies were identified in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases as per the PRISMA guidelines. In most studies, exosome-treated rodents exhibited improved cardiac function and angiogenesis together with decreased apoptotic cell death. MSC-Exos thus offer beneficial therapeutic efficacy when treating MI injury. However, further work will be necessary to standardize experimental preclinical models and to validate these results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available