4.5 Article

Liver transplantation in patients with post-hepatectomy liver failure - A Northern European multicenter cohort study

Journal

HPB
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1138-1144

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.12.005

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes the clinical experience of five northern European tertiary centers in using liver transplantation (LTX) to treat patients with severe, intractable post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). The study found that LTX can be a life-saving procedure with low short-term risk in selected patients with PHLF.
Background: Liver transplantation (LTX) has been described as a rescue treatment option in severe, intractable post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), but is not considered to be indicated for this condition by many hepatobiliary and transplant surgeons. In this article we describe the clinical experience of five northern European tertiary centers in using LTX to treat selected patients with severe PHLF. Methods: All patients subjected to LTX due to PHLF at the participating centers were identified from prospective clinical databases. Preoperative variables, surgical outcome (both resection surgery and LTX) and follow-up data were assessed.Results: A total of 10 patients treated with LTX due to severe PHLF from September 2008 to May 2020 were identified and included in the study. All patients but one were male and the median age was 70 years (range 49-72). In all patients the indication for liver resection was suspected malignancy, but in six patients post-resection pathology revealed benign or pre-malignant disease. There was no 90-day mortality after LTX. Patients were followed for a median of 49 months (13-153) and eight patients were alive without recurrence at last follow-up.Discussion: In selected patients with PHLF LTX can be a life-saving procedure with low short-term risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available