Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low-resection volume region: a population-level study examining the impact of hospital-volume on surgical quality and longer-term survival
Aaditya Narendra et al.
HPB (2020)
The actual 5-year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on real-world data
Axel Bengtsson et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2020)
Centralizing a national pancreatoduodenectomy service: striking the right balance
L. S. Nymo et al.
BJS OPEN (2020)
The effect of centralization on short term outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy in a universal health care system
Linn S. Nymo et al.
HPB (2019)
A nationwide cohort study of resection rates and short-term outcomes in open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
Kjetil Soreide et al.
HPB (2019)
An update on treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Aurelien Lambert et al.
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY (2019)
Patients with resected, histologically re-confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can achieve long-term survival despite T3 tumour or nodal involvement. The Finnish Register Study 2000-2013
Reea Ahola et al.
PANCREATOLOGY (2017)
Effect of centralization on long-term survival after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
R. Ahola et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2017)
Going the Extra Mile Improved Survival for Pancreatic Cancer Patients Traveling to High-volume Centers
Michael E. Lidsky et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2017)
Determinants of Outcomes Following Resection for Pancreatic Cancer-a Population-Based Study
Mary A. Waterhouse et al.
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY (2016)
Centralization of pancreatoduodenectomy a decade later: Impact of the volume-outcome relationship
Paul R. A. O'Mahoney et al.
SURGERY (2016)
Volume-outcome relationships in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer
Lydia G. M. van der Geese et al.
HPB (2016)
Major postoperative complications are associated with impaired long-term survival after gastro-esophageal and pancreatic cancer surgery: a complete national cohort study
Eirik Kjus Aahlin et al.
BMC SURGERY (2016)
Hospital teaching status and volume related to mortality after pancreatic cancer surgery in a national cohort
M. Derogar et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2015)
Impact of centralization of pancreatoduodenectomy on reported radical resections rates in a nationwide pathology database
Veronica G. Onete et al.
HPB (2015)
A Pancreaticoduodenectomy Risk Model Derived From 8575 Cases From a National Single-Race Population (Japanese) Using a Web-Based Data Entry System The 30-Day and In-hospital Mortality Rates for Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Wataru Kimura et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2014)
Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits?
Lindsay A. Bliss et al.
HPB (2014)
Quality of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: A systematic review
Reijo Sund
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2012)
Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes
Linda E. Levesque et al.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)
1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience
Jordan M. Winter et al.
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY (2006)
Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data
HD Quan et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2005)
Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume Centers
Y Fong et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2005)
The Finnish Cancer Registry as follow-up source of a large trial cohort - Accuracy and delay
P Korhonen et al.
ACTA ONCOLOGICA (2002)
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.
JD Birkmeyer et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2002)